Abhisar Sharma Founder & Principal Growth Strategist
Abhisar Sharma is the Founder and Principal Growth Strategist at imagineInk Marketing Solutions.
Use one manifest row per finished creative version. Record an asset ID, version, exact file reference, intended placement, approved message and destination, approval evidence, and acceptance state. Inspect the exported file rather than approving an editing canvas or an unbound screenshot. Hold incomplete or disputed rows, preserve superseded versions, and require another review when an accepted file changes. Creative acceptance permits the named file to enter the next agreed workflow; it does not by itself authorize a campaign launch, spending or targeting changes. Keep the accepted manifest revision beside the delivered exports. The producer, approver and receiver should be able to trace the same file without relying on an informal chat history.
A paid ad creative handoff should identify the exact files a media buyer may use, the destination they support and the decision that accepted them. A folder called “final” leaves those questions unanswered. When commissioning creative within paid advertising services, agree the deliverables and ownership through imagineInk’s ad creative design scope , then attach a versioned acceptance record to the finished exports.
This guide proposes that record: a small asset manifest connecting each export to its placement, approved message, destination and reviewer. It is an original operating worksheet, not a report of client results. Its purpose is to make a delivery decision inspectable before anyone builds or launches an advertisement.
Begin after the audience, offer and creative assignment are agreed. If those remain unclear, complete the marketing brief for the outsourced team first. The manifest records delivery against that decision; it should not become a second strategy brief.
Leave unresolved inputs visible as holds. A producer should not interpret silence as approval or choose an alternative offer to complete a row.
The following fictional workshop example illustrates the fields for a single static export. Its IDs and filenames are teaching labels, not a client campaign or a published asset. Store the working manifest somewhere both the producer and receiver can inspect; keep its accepted revision with the delivered files.
Compute a checksum only after the export is final, if your workflow uses one. Recompute it after a change; do not copy the previous value into a new version. A checksum identifies bytes, while the reviewer still has to judge whether those bytes are suitable.
| Field | Illustrative entry | Acceptance question |
|---|---|---|
| Asset and version | WORKSHOP-A, version C; replaces version B | Can the receiver distinguish this export from every earlier version? |
| File identity | workshop-a-vc.png; file size and checksum recorded from the delivered file | Does the downloaded file match the inspected export? |
| Intended use | Named platform, campaign type and placement; specification reference and review date | Was this particular use checked? |
| Message and destination | Accepted copy revision, offer reference and exact destination URL | Do the visible message and destination agree? |
| Evidence and decision | Reviewer, dated decision, preview and permission references | Can someone reconstruct what was approved? |
| State and next owner | Accepted for build; receiving media buyer named; launch approval pending | Is the permitted next action explicit? |
Google groups advertising asset specifications by product and campaign type, and describes responsive formats that combine supplied assets. Check the relevant requirements for the intended use instead of treating one generic export preset as sufficient. Google Ads asset specifications
MDN describes PNG as supporting transparency and JPEG as using lossy compression for still images. Those file characteristics can inform export choices, but browser format capability does not establish acceptance by a particular advertising product. Record the platform check separately. MDN image file types and formats
Where several assets may be combined, review the supplied messages for conflicting offers or qualifications. Record which assets belong together and which must remain separate. A preview is evidence of what was inspected, not a guarantee of every future rendering.
For informative images on a landing page, W3C WAI recommends text alternatives that communicate the essential information conveyed by the image. This is guidance for the destination page, not a claim that every ad platform provides an equivalent field. W3C WAI informative images tutorial
Assign that check to the page owner. If an important qualification exists only inside the landing-page image, request an appropriate text equivalent and review it in context. Do not mark the advertising export accepted merely because a separate page check passed.
Use a small state set: pending review, held, rejected, accepted for build and superseded. Explain every hold with a reason, owner and required next input. Rejection means the current proposal failed a stated check; superseded means a later accepted version replaced it. Neither should disappear from the record.
If a business owner approves version C while the buyer receives version B, pause the affected handoff. Resolve the mismatch against the preserved files and decision record. If the approved file itself changes, create a new version and review it again. Never repair uncertainty by overwriting the accepted export or reusing its approval.
For a destination change, identify every affected asset row and request a fresh message-to-page check. For a permission dispute, hold the material until the responsible owner supplies a decision. Keep credentials and private customer information outside the manifest.
A creative approver may accept the artwork while another person controls campaign creation, budgets, targeting and launch timing. Record those responsibilities independently. “Accepted for build” should name the permitted next action and any outstanding campaign decision; it should not be shorthand for “publish now.”
The receiving buyer can attach the accepted asset IDs to the campaign build record, then seek the required launch approval. A later performance review needs its own evidence. Delivery acceptance establishes neither advertising effectiveness nor a reason to increase spending.
This manifest is a proposed delivery method, not a platform policy audit, legal opinion or accessibility certification. Requirements can change, and the appropriate evidence depends on the actual product, placement and material. The worksheet does not select a winning concept, diagnose ad fatigue or promise better campaign results.
For the next creative assignment, agree the outputs, named reviewers and acceptance checks before production. Bring the intended placements, approved message, destination URLs and existing files to the scope discussion. Ask the creative provider to return a complete manifest with the final exports, then have the receiving owner verify that exact delivery.
Use these references at the point of review. Open the product and campaign guidance relevant to the planned placement, then record the exact requirement checked and the review date beside the affected asset. Use the format reference to investigate an export choice, and the accessibility tutorial when reviewing informative images on the destination page. Keep those decisions separate: a format explanation does not approve an advertising placement, and a page-image check does not approve a creative file. If a requirement is unclear or has changed, hold the affected row and ask its responsible owner to resolve the question.
Abhisar Sharma is the Founder and Principal Growth Strategist at imagineInk Marketing Solutions.
No. The brief defines the assignment and constraints before production. The manifest identifies the delivered versions, their intended use and the decisions that accepted them.
A rename alone does not establish that content changed. Check the actual file identity and retain the relationship to the accepted export. Changed content requires a new version and review.
Only when the separate campaign authority permits it. Creative acceptance does not authorize spending, targeting changes, account access or publication by itself.