How imagineInk prepares useful, reviewable content
imagineInk content begins with an assigned question, audience, owner and source plan. AI may assist drafting or analysis, but factual claims, expert judgment and publication decisions require human review.
Original value before volume
An asset should contribute experience, analysis, a framework or evidence instead of paraphrasing what already exists.
Sources and authorship
Use primary sources for platform, legal, medical or technical guidance where possible. Name a real author or reviewer when one is accountable for the content.
Updates and corrections
Review time-sensitive guidance, show meaningful update dates and correct material errors without silently rewriting the publication history.
Questions this page answers
Is AI-generated content published automatically?
No. AI assistance does not replace intent selection, subject review, source validation, editorial judgment or publication approval.
Are word-count targets used?
No universal word count determines quality. The page should be as complete and concise as the buyer question requires.
How are external links chosen?
Prefer the most authoritative source that directly supports the claim, and link to the specific relevant page rather than a generic homepage.